Monday, March 26, 2007

"Love Each Day" and get impaled by a metal rod


Are horror movies by definition insipid repetitions of cheap scares, where undeveloped characters you don't care about embark on meandering journeys and are then subject to arbitrary and relentless gore? If so, THE DESCENT is the perfect horror movie. Six (or five or seven, it really doesn't matter) women (some British, some American, one Asian) go on a crazy cave-diving trip in an unmarked cave in the Appalachians where they are one-by-one devoured alive by the molemen. It took about 40 minutes for the molemen to make an appearance; and only about 15 minutes into the movie, I had turned to Irwin and said, I'm not going to be able to continue watching this movie unless these girls start taking off their clothes and fucking each other or start getting killed. Unfortunately, there was no sex, except for the implied sex between the Asian chick who had been having an affair with the white-girl-protagonist's husband, who gets impaled by a metal rod in the first 5 minutes of the movie. Anyway once it gets going, it's a bit of a relief to see these obnoxious white girls get offed in the claustrophobic cave (the dyke-y girl is the first to go. because gays are immoral and deserve to die -- although this morality doesn't hold up -- why is the adulterous Asian chick who ends up accidentally murdering one of her companions one of the last ones standing? I guess to make her death that much more savory I suppose.) The cheap knee-jerk horror moments were really scary, I will give it that. At one point I got a charley horse in my calf from kicking out so suddenly and forcefully in reaction to the first moleman appearance (Still hurts today). But personally I prefer the more subdued horror movie, like The Ring, where the focus is on a given system of rules, and there is some attention to character and visual mise en scène.

Friday, March 23, 2007

Crazy Women and the Men They Ensnare

The first play I saw by Takeshi Kawamura was back in 2000. Hamlet Clone played in the Asahi Square A in Tokyo. I found this piece disorienting and incomprehensible -- like Hamlet Machine on acid. High school girls writhing around, a guy on a bicycle spouting off an unending monologue, and the director himself, perched on a high throne (I kid you not) in the middle of the audience, speaking text into a mic, like the voice of God. I had never seen such an explicit (blatant and shameless) display of artist ego weaved into the structure of a play. So when I watched his most recent offering AOI/KOMACHI on DVD I was surprised to find how accessible it was - and yet it retained the fascination, eroticism and grotesqueness of his aesthetic.

He had taken two classic noh plays and adapted them for contemporary theater. The original Aoi no Ue is a revenge story; Hikaru's lover Lady Aoi has fallen ill with a mysterious sickness. Turns out, the spirit of Hikaru's former (spurned) lover Rokujo has made Aoi sick. Kawamura sets his AOI in the salon of a karisuma biyoshi [charisma beautician] - apparently a real trend in Japan where coiffures themselves are elevated to the status of celebrity. Hikaru, the hairstylist (who has made hair not only his profession but his sexual obsession), has a young long-haired lover, Aoi, who, of late, has been prone to "seizures" and the like, and consequently has been in and out of a hospital. He suspects that the hair of his ex-lover Rokujo (who happens to be the wife of his primary patron, who also used him as a boy-toy) is at the root of this curse. Rokujo shows up and tries to implicate inextricable linked through sordid past - he helped her murder her husband and destroy the evidence (with sulfuric acid). Somehow, through re-living this event, Hikaru is able to release Aoi from the vengeful curse of Rokujo, though not without a price -- Aoi's jet-black hair (Hikaru's treasure) is completely shorn off. [Tamaki Kemmotsu, who played Aoi, told me she shaved her head just for this tour, FYI, you know who I'm talking to]. Each character seems to have his own version of reality which don't quite intersect with each other, leaving the audience in a strange space between fantasies, past and present. The story and acting style are extremely heightened and melodramatic, bordering on camp, but never quite taking the plunge.

KOMACHI is essentially a monologue; a down-and-out film director's mysterious journey through a strange dilapidated town where he discovers an abandoned movie house that screens forgotten films from the WWII era (many of them war propaganda, pro-Nazi), all starring the legendary actress Komachi, who has since disappeared from the film industry, some 40 years ago. The movie theater turns out to be inhabited (or haunted) by an aged couple, the woman (played by the butoh legend Akira Kasai) claiming to be Komachi. The film director, despite his fervent efforts to extricate himself, is sucked into the cycle of destructive love: any man who falls in love with the ageless beauty of Komachi is destined to die. In this case, the film maker seems doomed to wander endlessly in search of that "sweet primeval darkness," a precious essence of Japan that was lost in the war and through the process of forced democratization.

I feel weird writing about these plays when I am completely unbiased, having translated both of them into English and obsessively refining the subtitles for its tour here. But having had the privilege of seeing the show four times, I just wanted to express (mainly for myself to remember later) how thrilling and satisfying it is when theater works. There is nothing else like it, truly. Not that the production was totally mind-blowing or life-changing -- but they were both surprising and exciting, and the cumulative experience of watching them back to back, was a meditation on the ineffable nature of reality and the course of history. This is where Kawamura pulled strongly on noh theater: themes pertaining to the collapse of linear time, the co-existence of the flesh and spirit (and in many cases the spirit, brimming with earthly desire/attachment, living beyond the life of the body), and transformation of space all evoked the kind of excruciating mystique of noh, but presented in a much more palatable way (for a pop-audience). The film-maker's journey in KOMACHI held a magnetic fascination for me, all the way through to the last few scenes in which the aging Komachi exploded in a fiery dance that ended in her strangling the film-maker to death with unraveled film reels. I do wonder if the plays worked on the American audience on more than just a novelty entertainment level -- particularly AOI, which didn't quite land for me, either. But Kawamura insisted that these two pieces have to be performed back-to-back, with AOI first.
** On a side note: I feel like prominent modes and contemporary traditions of story-telling are making me more and more misogynist. I am much more compelled by male writers, and male protagonists. The female characters in AOI/KOMACHI are extreme antagonists with (self-)destructive traits/flaws. Which are fine and fun and all, but these days I feel more and more disturbed that there are no adult female characters that resonate with me -- if there is a play/film with an adult female protagonist, they always inevitably seem to revolve around romance (lack of, search for, loss of). Or they're totally crazy. I can't think of a story with an adult female protagonist that has really compelled me. I mean I loved Spirited Away and Pan's Labyrinth, but both of those were prepubescent girls --- It's like some kind of universally agreement that the only adventure a woman can have must take place prior to sexual awakening. I think about my favorite films and novels: all male protagonists. Is this my problem with my choices in books/films? Why do I feel this is such a void -- or rather, is this feeling justified, or have I become so misogynistic that I cannot relate to adult female protagonists? And do not cite Bridget Jones' Diary or I will smack you.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Lost in Translation

Growing up immersed (and simultaneously alienated from) both Japanese and American culture, I tend to forget sometimes just how difficult it is to bridge the gap between the two. Beyond linguistic obstacles, there are many things that are extremely difficult to convey and explain cross-culturally; the epitome of Japanese beauty lies in the subtle, the ambiguous, that which cannot be articulated whereas the American ideal is direct honesty and resounding open clarity. This fundamental discrepancy creeps into different aspects of the culture, like the sense of aesthetics, for example, or feeling, or HUMOR. Here's an example - my brother sent this youtube link to me this week. I circulated among the Japanese staff at my job, and people were literally unable to control their laughter. It's a dumb monologue of what Commodore Matthew Perry might have said to the Japanese to convince them to open up their country to foreigners after several hundred years of national seclusion.



The humor is not just in what he’s saying (which is pretty fucking hysterical) but in the timing, the tone, the negative spaces. Even if I were to translate his text faithfully, I seriously doubt a non-Japanese would find this amusing at all! (Actually I would be interested to hear what you thought of it)

Translation is the process of communicating an idea that is manifest in one system/language into another system/language. The systems are not necessarily compatible, but there is an assumption that we (the human race) have enough commonality to be able to understand one another. But what do you do when you’re trying to convey a concept that doesn’t exist in the other culture? To be more specific, in the case of theater – do you try to find an equivalent analogous relationship that the local audience can identify with, or leave it as is, faithful to the original concept, but risking alienating the local audience? Of course it’s never that black-and-white, it is a precarious balance of the two, upon which the success of cross-cultural communication rests.

On Tuesday I went to see The Play Company’s English-language premiere of The Attic, translated by Leon Ingulsrud and Keiko Tsuneda, originally written in Japanese by Yoji Sakate. Based on my prior conversations with Sakate, who happened to be in town and took part in rehearsals/production, he seemed concerned with the size of the set and the cast, which led me to have very low expectations for the American production – especially being so attached to the original Japanese production which toured the U.S. in 2005. But I was pleasantly surprised to find the show resonant and engaging, a rendition of the original that has a life of its own. The Attic is an exploration of a current Japanese phenomenon, a societal affliction called hikikomori (which literally means ‘withdrawn’), referring to a subculture of people who live their lives in total seclusion, holed up in their room without any direct contact with the outside world and stewing in their fanatic obsessions (for anime, for porn, for instant noodles, whatever). It’s not such a surprising symptom of a social disease, considering it is a reaction to a.) extremely rigid societal structures and expectations, and b.) limited physical space. I mean, we complain about the sizes of our New York apartments, but think about the land of capsule hotels. The conceit behind the play is that these isolationist have paved the way for a high demand new product called The Attic – a pre-fab, cabin-like, tent-sized structure you can stick anywhere (your bedroom, on the street) for added privacy. Buy it on-line, lock yourself in, block the rest of the world out and call yourself the king of infinite space (as long as you’ve got your wireless connection!). Multiple storylines collide through the course of 20+ vignettes: a college student is found having committed suicide in an Attic in his dorm room, and his older brother vows to get to the bottom of it by tracking down the mysterious manufacturers of the Attic; a pair of bumbling detectives/samurai/soldiers (played by the same two actors over three different scenes) find refuge in an abandoned Attic during a stakeout or on a battlefield; a mentally unstable OCD woman convinced that she is pregnant finds solace in the womb-like Attic; and a mother discovers that her violent son has been keeping a young girl locked up in an Attic – for the last 10 years (based on a true incident) – and many many more. The Attic itself becomes a metaphor, a microcosm, a macrocosm, a container that limits its contents to the darkest, most intimate secrets of the human psyche, and holds the entirety of the universe, boundless and timeless.

Sakate originally developed and wrote these 23 characters for 17 members of his company Rinko-gun. The American production featured 8 actors in multiple roles; and though the actors were up to this feat of extreme versatility, they seemed forced to make broad, and often stereotyped/caricatured character choices that resulted in less nuanced performances. Nonetheless, the strength of the original script shone through unquestionably. Perhaps the one thing that fell into the category of what could not survive the translation process was metaphysics, or sense of spirituality. The Japanese, though far from fervently religious, acknowledge the spiritual world in the day-to-day (the animist influences of Shinto): the dead, the living, the souls of animals and plants all co-exist. On the other hand, from the Western perspective, the living are living, and the dead are, well, dead, and if the dead make visitation upon the living, something is definitely awry. This difference in attitude towards the spiritual realm plays a significant role in The Attic. So what happens when a fluid concept built on ambiguity is forced into clarity? You lose the beauty of mystery.

On Wednesday, I attended a performance of they say the men are over in the Steel Tower by Hideo Tsuchida (translated by M. Cody Poulton) which was an unfortunate example of failed translation. What should have been a light-hearted yet grippingly poignant comedy about a rollicking band of schlocky vaudevillian clowns caught in a war zone on enemy territory while entertaining the troops – turned out to be an painful exercise in patience. First, the English script was in terrible shape; stuck in an academic limbo of word-for-word translation, the dialogue was stiff and clumsy. For a comic work (in which the rhythm of text is paramount in communicating playful levity) to be so stunted by strange phrasings and word choices was a shame. They kept the character names in Japanese, which is fine except for the fact that the actors could not wrap their mouths around them, let alone embrace them. The actors were also unfortunately miscast; though each actor had his own charm, they all seemed out of sync with their characters. For example, the character of Yoshimura, who from the script seems to be the most naïve, exuberant, zippy one of the bunch, is played by an actor whose strength seemed to be in playing a lumbering doofus. But truly the greatest tragedy of this comedy was that it was not funny. Not one iota. The jokes weren’t funny, the bits weren’t funny, the song & dance number, the physical schticks, nothing. Without the humor, the And the blame lay not only in the script, but in the lack of love and verve of the ensemble, and, bad direction. It was as if the director had decided she was working on Someone Who'll Watch Over Me (the Frank McGuiness play an Irishman, an Englishman and an American who are kidnapped by Arabs and held hostage in Lebanon – sound like a set-up for a joke? It’s not) or something; actually it was more like she had her humor center in her brain removed. Is this completely unfair? (as this is the third time I’m having to write this, I am quickly losing my patience.) The truth is, both Sakate and Tsuchida are writer/directors, who, like many writer/directors in the Japanese theater, are founder/artistic directors of their own small theater companies – and they write FOR their company members, who work and sweat together. Work generated from years of hard work and commitment and relationships forged over time cannot be emulated by casting the 5 best comic actors who show up to an open-call audition and rehearsing for 4 weeks. Don’t need much of a sense of humor to figure that out. They say comedy is the most difficult thing to translate, which I believe, and comdey also seems so contingent on the MOMENT -- who is in the audience, how tired they are, the mood of the day and the room, etc. No amount of intangible circumstances of the day could truly affect the accumulation of bad choices, though.

I didn’t want to end on such a down note, so I will quote Dawn who said to me after the show, “Bad theater is better than no theater.” Hey, it’s Dawn’s quote, not mine. onwards.

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Ajax & Leonidas

Though both of the two pieces I saw over the weekend invoked the names of heroes from ancient Greek times, the two could not be more completely diametrically opposed.

On Friday I accompanied Alanna to see the Butane Group's Operation Ajax (a game of skill and chance) with some trepidation. Simply because this was the first time I was seeing Noel's work (who also created/directed the Chomsky show) from the outside. Constructed in chapters from over 20 text sources, Ajax tells the story of the 1953 CIA-led coup that brought down the democratically elected secular Iranian government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, setting in motion a course of events resulting in the current religion-based government of Iran and the big mess of international politicking/warring/economics that have the American Empire all twisted around today. The visually sparse show took place in a white corner room with large windows with views of the cityscape on the 13th floor in a midtown building, with only a casino table and a barstool for a set. The play was thankfully surprisingly lucid in educating the audience to the key players of events of and surrounding Operation Ajax, but beyond the history lesson, the piece was most successful and exciting when the scenes of dramatic interaction between characters and inner monologues were juxtaposed with another set of rules. For example, CIA agent Kermit Roosevelt (played by the ever-watchable Jay Smith) and the Shah of Iran discussing the overthrow of PM Mossadegh was played as a delicate seduction scene, underneath the casino table. And the found confessional text of a compulsive gambler interwoven with Kermit's monologue about climbing up the CIA ladder. These layered compositions offered a refreshing respite from the dogmatic dialogue which portrayed characters as two-dimensionally good or evil -- after all, the most engaging characters are those who embody contradiction. The climax of Op Ajax was similar to that of the Chomsky show: a seemingly never-ending litany of overt and covert CIA operations since Operation Ajax, rattled off by the ensemble with increasing intensity and accompanied by hand gestures as Kermit ceaselessly circled the parameter of the room clockwise, to terrifying and hypnotic effect. Despite the unevenness of the show and performances, it was great to see Noel's mind and vision at work in representing such complex materials, especially for a history dummy like me.

And last night, believe it or not, Irwin and I made it to the opening weekend of 300 based on Frank Miller's graphic novel, filmed entirely on set. I would argue that though the film made every possible choice to retain the sensibility and aesthetics of Miller's novel, the lush live-action eye-candy cannot really convey the simplicity & beauty of frames on a page. What did work? The slow-fast motion battle sequences and lighting effects. Epic has never been so distilled: the heroic are heroic, the treacherous are treacherous, the ugly are ugly, and ladies are all about the nipples. The rest, well I don't need to even detail them in complete sentences. Thousands of yards of heavy blood-red fabric, metal weaponry, and leather straps to showcase a hundred waxed and oiled male torsos with rippling pecs and 6-packs. Honor, deception, obstacles, loyalty, humans trying their hand at being divine. and lots and lots of testosterone. Did I mention the pecs?

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

The Host with the Most

This is a few weeks overdue, but I guess timely, since The Host is now opening in theaters. In brief: a thinly-veiled anti-American monster/horror/family drama movie. An American military officer in a Korean base orders a Korean worker to pour about a thousand gallons of toxic formaldehyde down the drain which flows into the Han River. Years later (surprise surprise) a crazy fishy amphibious monster emerges from water to wreak havoc on young couples and families enjoying a balmy afternoon on the riverbank. Idiosyncratic plot points and awkward character development are overridden by the sheer adrenalin-inducing hunt/chase for the vicious and hungry creature who has snagged the precious youngest from a family of oddballs. Def worth seeing for weekend fun -- follow with some bulgogi, suun dubu, kimchi and a nice glass of soju.

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Wayward Wooster: (s)Wallow Watermelon

I walked out of the Wooster Group's Hamlet at St. Ann's at intermission -- even after having purchased the tickets practically 6 months in advance. I should have known better than to expect more than a barrage of layered, refracted, de/re-construction of every manifestation of Hamlet since the invention of recording devices. Maybe that's satisfying for some people? As some kind of intellectual exercise? Christ. Maybe I am just old-fashioned (?!) but honestly, may I not expect something more immediate and emotionally engaging in the theater? Why does everything need to be so goddam removed or ironic or "in quotes"? I mean, I don't mind that, in and of itself, but that must that be the be-all and end-all? So often I leave the theater saying, YES... AND?? ok that was a clever thing you just did, but I am not moved by form itself. ('Where is the "'GHOST' in the 'SHELL'"?')

Anyway what I really want to talk about is Wayward Cloud by Taiwanese director Tsai Ming-Liang which I just saw last night at Anthology Film Archives. An (un)erotic/poetic, imagistic portrayal of love in a time of drought. Water is scarce this unbearable summer in Taiwan, but abundant are watermelons -- the sweet sticky juice of which cannot really replace the cleansing purity of good old H2O. A girl recognizes the boy from whom she purchased a wristwatch many years (films) ago. Boy is now a porn star and sex for him is far from an expression of human connection. There is hardly any dialogue at all (much of the text I recall is from the TV newscaster reporting on the consequences of the rising water prices) as this delicate and uncertain relationship unfolds through home-cooked meals and midnight walks. The juxtaposition of the tedious mechanics of porn-fucking and the boy's inability to have sex with the girl he actually fancies leaves an echoey hollow in the story -- which is filled by uber-campy explosive, colorful musical dance numbers. A parade of people with watermelon umbrellas swarm inside a dragon-tunnel; boy in big plastic penis costume is chased around a public toilet by scary women with traffic cone boobs; boy as crooning glittery mer-man paddles in the rooftop water supply. The final and excruciating scene of the film shows the porn film crew shooting boy fucking unconscious Japanese co-star -- while girl peeps through a window in the wall. The fucking is sad, exhausting and disturbing, until boy makes eye contact with girl. Suddenly despite the physical obstacles and distance between them, something snaps into place -- and somehow boy and girl are (metaphysically) fucking each other passionately, and in the moment of boy's orgasm he shoves his unconscious partner and video crew away to ejaculate in girl's mouth, through the window. Then a long shot of his butt clenching and unclenching in climax, followed by profile of girl's face buried in boy's pubic hair. A tear rolls down her cheek. The music swells over the final ridiculous image of girl standing in the hallway with boy's groin up against her face through the window.

Watermelon shakes (esp in Thailand) have always been my favorite summer drink but I'll never drink it the same way again.

---> one more thing! I think sex is really tricky on film and can often go wrong. But WWC was lovely in that it depicted the sex act through a journey from titillating eroticism to panning out to show the menial side of the porn industry to a desperate burst of true passion. Compared to the very strange blow job in Vincent Gallo's The Brown Bunny that seemed an unfortunate ending to what could have been (stretch stretch) a poignant meditation on love and loss (and rape and motorcycles and bad boyfriends and the oh-so-thin line between reality and film), Wayward Cloud definitely earned its cumshots.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Don't Wake Me Up


Once every three years I'll go check out what Richard Foreman is doing. Just for kicks. Over the last decade I think I've seen three or four pieces; they could have been Permanent Brain Damage, Bad Boy Nietzsche, Cowboy Rufus something or other, and Now That Communism is Dead, My Life Feels Empty. I cannot tell you with any certainty which of these I actually saw, and which of these I just imagined I saw, because frankly, I could never tell any of his plays apart from each other (except occasionally by cast - he always had the downtown greats like my favorites James Urbaniak & T Ryder Smith) -- until now. I think Sophia Skiles worked with him for a while and she just loved it. I found this shocking because I'd assumed that an actor with her level of talent would feel humiliated by being reduced to a pawn of Foreman's theatro-masturbatory-subconscious universe. Don't get me wrong, I'd always found Mr. Foreman's pieces nerve-wracking, visually/aurally fascinating (to the point of excruciating pain), and the whole synergy of his work mysterious, beautiful, ugly, frustrating, funny and not fun. I'd fallen into the habit of describing his plays like what I would imagine it would be like to peer into the mind of an insane person. That's worth a visit every couple of years, don't you think? It's like choosing to sniff your dirty socks juuuust to remind yourself how bad your feet can smell. (metaphorically speaking, of course.)

Last night I went with Yoko and Ryo, who were both Foreman virgins, to WAKE UP MR. SLEEPY! YOUR UNCONSCIOUS MIND IS DEAD! At first glance, the theater appeared as I expected. White and black-and-white-striped string running across the plane between stage and audience; indecipherable texts scrawled on newspapered walls, stage full of clutter and chairs, white-faced mannequins fixing their blank stare on the house, secret compartments, and a large airplane model suspended from the ceiling, full of plastic baby dolls -- your typical gothic-flavored Foreman set. But what happened once the show began was not the typical Foreman nightmare I'd come to see; it was more of an unpleasant but innocuous lite nap.
I'd heard that he was using video now -- images of the same video projected on two walls, filmed with Portuguese actors (repeating lines in English). Five live actors, scuffling about on stage, gesturing and executing movements to the droning sound/lightscape of recorded repeated text, blind-the-audience lights, more gesturing.... on page this seems pretty standard. But the way in which everything was executed, with an utter blandness on top of blandness, proved how long 65 minutes can be. I'd come expecting to cringe and be repulsed by the focused intensity towards blandness that created such a disturbing and nauseating effect by precise performance. Instead, compositions were sloppy, performers were mediocre to the point of invisibility, video footage equally pedantic -- in the end 65 minutes without any tension. The most compelling performances came from the aforementioned blinding lights -- which, towards the end of the show were what were disturbing my slumber. I think I made eye contact with some actors a few times I forced myself to wake up and pay attention to the stage. The first time I was mildly embarrassed to be caught sleeping by the performer. After the second time, I just didn't care.

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Where is The Other Here, if there is no there there?

What is a human's life worth, in the end? What do we work for? Who do we work for? Do our achievements, our wealth, our accomplishments accumulate in any truly quantifiable, or rather, truly meaningful way? Or is there really only silence, nothing within nothing, nothing to hold in our cupped hands, nothing to show for after we pass? Is there something in the negative space? Are our sentiments communicated to another -- or do they outgrow their tiny containers and become unwieldy, or reticent? What if our gifts to each other only reveal themselves to be burdens? What do we owe each other in life, in death?


These are the questions that strike me thinking about the show I saw last night (and will see another 4 times) The Other Here is an intriguing piece from Big Dance Theater, and surprisingly (almost to a fault) linear and easy to follow in terms of a narrative, I found myself craving more of a sense of mystery and the painful hollowness that Ibuse's writings suggest. The company wove together (rather too comfortably for my taste) two Ibuse short stories (The Carp and Life at Mr. Tange's) and found texts from a life insurance convention. The resulting tale about an aging insurance salesman, his servant, and a carp given to him by a now-deceased friend really begins nowhere and ends nowhere -- and i don't mean that in a bad way at all. Scenes from an insurance conference (complete with sporadic questions from the convention audience) and terse, often-incomplete dialogue between characters are interspersed with heartfelt Okinawan pop songs in quotes and dances that emerge and dissipate like the wind.


The ensemble of actor-dancers held the audience with sure, playful and trustworthy hands. Though there were many people in the audience who were perplexed by the piece's seeming to never land here or there, or anywhere at all -- I thought that that was where I could find magic and resonance the most: in the liminal spaces between between form and content, story and dance.

Sunday, February 04, 2007

El Laberinto del Fauno

Finally saw Pan's Labyrinth last night. I was very intrigued by what my friends were saying about the movie. Two friends said it was excessively (and unnecessarily?) violent, that the parallel stories of the Spanish Civil War & fairytale did not work, and that there was one decision the protagonist makes in the film that is unjustified and unbelievable. Two other friends said it was their favorite film of 2006.

I feel I ought to say outright before I go any further that I am a total sucker for stories that feature young female protagonists (like my favorite, Spirited Away) and the fact that the heroine's name was Ofelia worked not so unconsciously to rack up points in the film's favor. But even compared to Guillermo's previous films (Mimic -- [which I saw in Thailand in one of those moments of desperate need for a dose of American culture] a pretty visually stunning portrayal of a world trying to contain disease; The Devil's Backbone -- the ghost of a boy drowned in an underground pool under an orphanage seeks revenge, set, here too, during the Spanish Civil War; and Hellboy -- based on the beautiful comic book, a mutated demon born of scientific/occult experiments of the Nazis fights now for the good guys (i.e. American bureau) while seeking the roots of his own diabolic heritage) Labyrinth seemed to realize all of del Toro's obsessions clearly. The horrific violence of war epitomized by the pathologically twisted & fascistic capitan, juxtaposed with the wonderfully mysterious grotesqueness of the fairytale world worked to demonstrate the inextricable link - no, the absolute dependent relationships of light and dark, the real and the imagined. And the world of the imagined/dark lies only a chalk's length away from the world of the real/light.
I know fuck-all about Spanish history, but del Toro's themes resonate beyond specifics: there is no justice in life, but there is beauty. How are the horrors of humanity (war, violence, sickness, injustice) digested, represented, perpetuated (in order to make digestable) by the imagination and collective mythology of our cultures? Or rather, how can innocence survive (does it survive?) in such a sickened world? I didn't mind the violence, I have to say -- simply because my horror at the violence was as potent as my fascination for the mystical -- in fact I would argue that both are necessary to get the point across. Yeah, I pretty much bought it all the way, now makes my top 3 of 2006 for sure.
p.s. When I first began seeing posters for this movie, I thought it was for The Golden Compass (Pan referring to the protagonist's daemon-avatar-soulmate-doppelganger Pantalaimon), from the His Dark Materials Trilogy by Philip Pullman -- a mind-blowing read, and incidentally the film adaptation will be coming out in theaters later this year, starring the frigid Nicole Kidman.

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Pages Out of Order

Yoshiko Chuma is a force of nature. If you ever met her, you'd know exactly what I mean. The intensity, velocity and passion with which she communicates is sometimes too much to handle. So I was surprised when, in the cab over to DTW, Yoko told me that her work is consistently finely crafted, deliberate and clean. I'd sat in on one rehearsal for Page Out of Order: M at the Mabou Mines studio maybe a month ago. I was mesmerized by the repeating and intensifying sequence of two men manipulating two tables, throwing them at each other, catching them, sliding over and under them -- interspersed was some text about national/cultural identity. I was excited to see the piece in its entirety, with the huge 8' x 8' cubes I'd heard about, and the video projections. Plus my friend Saori is in the show, and she is just such a phenomenon to watch.

I have to say that... I just didn't get it. I didn't get it. I didn't get it. Maybe it was the frame of mind I was in. But... There were a lot of things going on: two, and at times maybe three (?) projectors showing clips from b/w film (presumably Macedonian films, since the theme was Macedonia, and the piece was built through Yoshiko's experiences traveling and working there); the aforementioned texts about national identity and repetition/overlapping; dancing through, between, under these massive skeletal cubes; swaths of cloth manipulated to become different articles of clothing as well as wrappings for corpses; a live band which included of three amazing Japanese traditional instrumentalists and the kick-ass vocalizations from Sizzle Ohtaka, whose is also a benshi, or narrator for silent films; and Yoshiko performing a solo herself, while being masked and unmasked by screened cubes, projections, her shadow turning and writhing against the muslin.

For all these delicious elements, I could not for the life of me, find a way to piece them together in a way that made any cohesive sense to me. I left feeling as if I had just not studied enough Macedonian history, or Macedonian film history (sorry Kyoko-san) to fully appreciate what was being done here. But hey, let me in for God's sake. I'm not a dummy. Granted I am not a dance fanatic either, and maybe my theater-trained brain is too rigid to appreciate the internal logic of this work -- but if a piece begins with text or language, I do expect there to be a discernable thread, linear or otherwise. I read the reviews about PAGES being a commentary on art and political upheaval etc. but that's too broad, too general for me. (And it's like some kind of RULE now, that performance has to be political in order to be noteworthy at all). That's my main complaint about dance, actually, is that more often than not, there is no journey. For all the movement, the work is a static expression as opposed to something that moves, grows, unfolds and changes... OK come on, fight with me.

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Cry for me, Tiger


I didn't know anything about Tears of the Black Tiger (or, Fah Talai Jone) when Irwin bought the ticketsfor the screening at Film Forum. And anyway, no review or preview could have aptly prepared me for this techni-color "pad thai Western." After witnesing all the cheesy cinematic techniques (in the suspension prior to a shoot-out, the gunslinger in the foreground is dollied across, creating the illusion of a pan against a painted sunset; or the hyper-violent shot of a slo-mo bullet shattering the villain's mouthful of teeth before splashing his brains out upon the vivid green grass) executed with such unabashed conviction, I was shocked to later learn that the film had been made in 2001 (not the 60's or 70's?!). I found the film remarkably without camp or irony for a contemporary film... or maybe the irony was so thick I didn't realize I was swimming it in. It did not compare to Sholay, the 4-hour epic grandmother of all Bollywood movies (a former police commissioner whose family is murdered and arms chopped off by a local bandit hires two petty thieves and rollicking buddies to save his town), but still, today I found myself thinking about the sequence in which two cowboy-bandits swear their loyalty to each other by:
a.) pouring some clear liquid presumably alcoholic into two glasses;
b.) slicing their wrists open and pouring their blood into the aforementioned glasses;
c.) chugging the concotion, then twirling around each other in a joyous dance, all in front of a grand statue of a Buddha.
Sabai-dee, dudes.

Friday, January 05, 2007

Catching up on films

I see a lot of movies, and though many are forgettable, there are some I'd like to keep track of. From the recent past (autumn/winter 2006):

The Flower of my Secret (Almodovar)
Very Almodovar... saw this with Kayoko + Ryo the same night as:

Half Nelson
which i thought was excellently acted

other movies I liked in 2006:
Babel, Little Miss Sunshine, Lunacy, The Meaning of Life

wait this is boring to talk about movies everyone's seen and talked about already...

Last night I watched BE WITH ME on dvd. even though Irwin was falling asleep during it after we argued over where the film was taking place for about 30 minutes, I thought it was beautifully shot. All the segments of food preparation were amazing. the lack of speech was great. the storyline of the deaf-blind woman was incredible. I couldn't stand the repetitive and predictable piano score, which, for a film with hardly any dialogue, really stood out, unfortunately. The film often teetered towards the maudlin (assisted by the aformentioned piano), i was about ankle-deep in mush, but that is a completely subjective thing, i think. I enjoyed the pace of the film, and the time and manner in which it unfolded.

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Children of Men

Saw this tonight with Irwin. It ain't no Garden of Eden. But it was a kind of re-creation myth for our times. A post-apocalyptic survival movie which portrayed a world that is frighteningly similar to the one we live in now, except the veil has been lifted, and there are no boundaries to the violence, xenophobia, desperation. A world in which ALL FOREIGNERS have become illegal aliens and are routinely capture, imprisoned in refugee camps, tortured and so on. There is a resistance movement that is corrupt or at least divided. And a portrayal of the refugee camp as a miniature/underground city, it fit the description of the prisons in ---- god i can't remember, there was an article i read about a prison in a country in the middle east or south america (???) where it was practically a full-blown city with an economy and ecology of its own... where was it? anyway

The things I liked about it: the brutality and seeming incidental nature of violence and death. A focus on the world, a system, rather than the story of the individual. That the film does follow a journey, but the portion of that journey as presented in the film is incomplete -- that is, the journey has already been in motion and will continue to be in motion before and after the film.

The ending: I could tell there must have been multiple versions of the ending. Part of me wanted to see the ending with no redemption. Just a pan out as Clive Owen is dying in the row boat, and the woman and baby, left alone in the choppy waters disappearing into the fog... I'm sure people would have had a fit if they ended like that.

grade: A-
irwin's grade: 94 (out of 100, which would i guess make it an A)

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Happy 2007! Routine Hearing at HERE

As a HERE Artist in Residence, I will present my own play in the Culturemart Festival next week (Jan 12 & 13). I'm also supposed to go see all the other HARPies' shows, which, honestly, I don't see how that is supposed to be feasible, considering everyone is going to be in rehearsals up til the day of their own show.

Anyway I managed to go see David Morris and Juliet Chia's show last night (Jan 2), Routine Hearing. I was not expecting to enjoy this work -- only because I'm not such a fan of audience participation, nor am I a fan of overtly political work, which I had the impression this would be. But I was pleasantly surprised to find myself genuinely engaged and excited by many of the ideas they were exploring. Though I found the program to run rather long, and there were some logistical kinks to the structure, the fundamental ideas about the physiological process of hearing/listening were fascinating. Some things I learned: regardless of whether you are right or left-handed, your right ear (and left brain) are wired to be receptive to language. Due to selective hearing, many times we will pick up on changes in tone/emotion rather than changes in content of text. According to a scientific study that monitored numerous staunch Democrats and Republicans, they found that while the subjects were made to listen to political speeches, the area of their brains used for LOGICAL REASONING was NOT engaged. Extrapolate from that -- the current bifurcation of our political system is resulting in people making decisions on moral grounds instead of thinking things through and digesting new information logically.

So the thing about the performance was that there were no performers -- or rather, the audience members were the performers. We all had to sit on chairs on a grid on stage, and with CD-players in hand, press play when instructed. With 10 different variant CD's, it was unlikely that the person sitting next to you would be listening to the same thing. We were instructed by the woman's voice on the CD to physicalize our listening, in an attempt for us to become more conscious of our own process of listening. Lean forward when drawn in. Lean back with arms folded when disgusted. Cup the right ear and turn to the left when ambivalent. Turn to the right and look behind the chair when distracted. There were three sessions during which I listened to maybe 7 or 8 different audio tracks, ranging from Rush Limbaugh to Francis Fukuyama to Stephen Colbert, a wide spectrum of conservatives, neo-conservatives, and radical left, and all throughout this, we all worked at physicalizing our hearing.

The surprise pay-off at the end, was that we'd been videotaped the whole time, and they replayed our movements in fast motion to classical music (projected onto the floor of the stage), so we could see what kinds of floor patterns, gestures and choreography out listening created. A dance for political hearing.

The CD players limited aggressive movement (maybe podcast next time?), and the whole exercise was rather long. Many audience/participants were either confused, reluctant, or just plain got tired after a while. Nevertheless, this piece (play?) did unearth questions about our process of not only listening but participating in a democracy. It was strange to be the observer and observed all at once, very meta... But in a way that is what participating in democratic society is about, right?

Sunday, December 31, 2006

Best of 2006

Thinking back on all the live performances I saw in 2006, I am a bit sad to say that all the show in my top3 were works from outside the u.s. not surprising, but still disheartening... what does that say? well let's not dwell on that...

the countdown for me would go like this:

#3: hedda gabler, schaubuhne am lehniner platz, directed by thomas ostermeier
This was the saving grace of the Next Wave festival at BAM (http://bam.org) for me -- I had the very bright idea of buying subscription tickets to a shitload of shows with a shitload of my friends, it was an organizational nightmare, and something i'll not do again... at least for the next 5 seasons. Anyway, this show was BEAUTIFULLY designed, and so smartly directed. this was the first production of ibsen's that really made sense to me in a contemporary context. i did fall asleep in the first half, but that's just the way my life has been... i appreciated the production for NOT dumbing down the characters, and allowing them to have complex interactions -- yet remaining advocates of ibsen's original scipt. the beach boys soundtrack was revealing and worked well, not cutesy.

#2: back to the present, constanza macras / dorky park
Irwin took me to see this because his friend kevin slavin did the video for it (the choreographer is kevin's ex) ok nevermind the complicated relationships... (too much) this was a dance piece (also from GERMANY, as #3) at DTW (http://dtw.org) with lots of theatrical elements, karaoke singing to bon jovi, elvis costello, violent lovers fight with lots of thrown chairs, wrestling choreography with mounds of stuffed animals, bizarre orchestra vignettes and video following each perfomer's personal nightmare. what's it like to be a young creative person living in the first world/europe? it didn't hook me til the second act -- at first i thought it was just kitschy and too-cool-for-williamsburg. but somehow it managed to be much more revelatory and personal in the second half. it reminded me a lot of what the international wow company was trying to do (at least in my mind) in the early days (1997-2001), full of love, raw, vulnerable, edgy, a la mode, punk rock, young love and lots of sweat and more love...

and...

#1: rehearsal hamlet, cia dos atores
It's been almost a year since I saw this show.... three times!!! lisa hori was visiting me at the time. at the public theater, but not really the public (I mean, come on, does the public do anything really interesting, ever?) the under the radar festival (thanks mark russell -- for 2007 line-up: http://www.publictheater.org/UTR/shows.php). A troupe from Brazil (http://www.ciadosatores.com.br/home_fr.html). BRILLIANT exploration of Hamlet. so inventive and fun and smart and moving... the company of about 6 or 7 actors, flitting in and out of different characters, on an essentially bare stage with simple props (clip lamps, shower caps, mics, suitcases, boombox, vase of sand, video camera). Images to remember: Rosenkrantz & Guildenstern as the red and blue power rangers entering to the theme song of pacman; Gertrude trying to dress Hamlet in clothes way too small; the actor (male) playing laertes and polonius and ophelia all together; "agua agua agua" song for the drowning of ophelia, laertes's eulogy to ophelia as he takes a hot iron to a raw steak... and proof this is a small world, i kept running into the director enrique diaz all over town that week, it became embarrassing. but it turns out that he went to saratoga (for the siti thing) with ravi jain several years ago -- which is why half the siti company were in the audience on closing night, and that was rather obnoxious because enrique gave a post-show shoutout to them -- i mean, ok, whatevs, man, the siti folks are cool and all, but what those brazilians made was far more interesting and emotional and shocking than anything i've seen by siti. sorry, just my humble opinion. hope the brazilians make their way back, or maybe i should head down there... capoeira anyone?

Friday, September 15, 2006

YUBIWA Hotel: CANDIES girlish hardcore

I'll start with a kind of self-serving one... I work at Japan Society in the Performing Arts program. I do a shitload of stuff there, from contracting artists, booking/selling tours, organizing publicity, writing the playbill and brochures, writing grants, translating scripts, translating events, organizing programs/events, etc. and on and on.

This week we kicked off the season with YUBIWA Hotel's CANDIES: girlish hardcore.

Shirotama is a friend of mine. I helped her with a lot of stuff when she was in NY for 6 months on the ACC grant. She put on this crazy show that happened simultaneously in NYC and Tokyo, and the actresses connected with their scene partners via the internet. Some kind of video-conferencing program that had a deadly 8 second delay. She worked with 4 NY-based actors here and directed her 4 Japanese actors via internet too. insanity.

I feel like she is trying to express/explore the same subject matter in all of her work. Essentially - the experience of growing up as a girl. Or how a woman (a Japanese woman) is taught how to interface with the world. Though her work always has images and ideas that are engaging and striking, I always felt on some level that she fed into the objectification and fetishism of cute japanese girls, rather than opposed such phenomena or offered an alternative to them.

But CANDIES was somehow different for me. There was something very bare about this one, very vulnerable. It wouldn't make much sense for me to describe what happens here; it was essentially a series of vignettes and montages that were not really linear or narrative, many scenes accompanied by a voiceover of an older woman reciting a pensive poetic text about all the things she's lost in her life. We follow 5 girls from childhood into old age, at times wearing animal masks, moving through what should be prominent events in one's life: marriage, going to school, playing basketball, death, and making pancakes out of another woman's secretions and eating them with your best friend. always a highlight for me.

But something happened in this piece, the cumulative affect of these quizzical interactions, and the lovely finale where the 5 women discard their animal masks, frilly skirts, and dance a kind of repetitive, frenetic strip tease that ended with them putting out their cigarettes on the soles of their high-heeled shoes -- it was extremely moving. This is why I think Shirotama is pretty great, despite her idiosyncracies. She can capture these moments, and create a visceral, emotional experience out of scraps and pieces. I was left really wondering what a human being's life, a woman's life, ultimately consists of. "So, walk alone, like a rhonoceros' horn." The strength and the loneliness of abandoning one's family, friends, lovers, community. What are you without your community? What are you without your culture? Can you really shed your cultural identity? Your gender identity?

Oh Shirotama. Once she came from Japan to stay at my house, and she brought 2 other people with her -- without telling me she was bringing more people. But she's a sweetheart. She's got this big fat old orange cat she's in love with. http://www.yubiwahotel.com/