Monday, November 19, 2007

The REAL popular theater


I saw something a few weeks ago which amazed me to such an extent that even after 2 weeks I'm still not sure I can convey the complexity of the event.

My co-worker and longtime friend Nyan-nyan-chan took a few (well-deserved) days off of work. I assumed that he was just going to be holing up at home with some pornos, as is his habit, but in fact he was working on a show from Japan. He kept referring to it as 大衆演劇 "popular theater" of the worst kind, and coming from him, who most of the time LOVES the razzle-dazzle simple pleasures of spectacle in entertainment for the masses, that was saying a lot.

Let me backtrack a little bit and say that in my academic studies of theater, in the early to mid-1990s, we meticulously followed the course of popular theater across culture and throughout human history. Theater has historically been a dirty low-class business, hardly a step away from prostitution. Certain rulers, patrons and artists were able to elevate theater and promote it as an intellectual and artistic endeavor, but its populist roots were deep. And so it was in Japan. The first appearance of the seeds of traditional theater were in sarugaku, a form of song and dance. Originally women performed by the riverbanks in the outskirts of town -- but because this entertainment was so deeply tied to prostitution, women were banned from performing. Out of sarugaku arose what has come to be known as noh theater (the solemn, serious, mystical heavy slow drama, performed with droning chants and jolting percussion-heavy music, and masks) and kyogen, noh's comic cousin, much akin in form and content to commedia dell'arte. Now, after several hundred years of codification of the physical training and staging, both noh and kyogen are treated with great reverence as an irreplaceable relic and living cultural treasure. But when you think about it, hundreds of years ago, the Lords of feudal society were paying for noh and kyogen actors to entertain them.

So if noh & kyogen (and kabuki) as we know them today have tracked the trajectory of the "high" art in terms of fidelity of principal and construction, custom and systemic rituals of the form, then where has the spirit of popular theater gone?

Well not to fret, it is alive today, tottering on shaky legs, in Sawa Ryuji, The Return. Sawa Ryuji is an old school populist actor. He and his "school" of theater is precisely that of popular theater. It is about entertaining the masses, it's about spectacle and drama (laugh and cry, and catharsis). So for its value as a cultural phenomenon alone his show was worth seeing.

As for the show itself... There is no way for me to aptly describe what it was, but let me try. Imagine a showcase/revue, a sequence of vignettes, scenes, dances and songs, featuring a variety of performers playing a variety of different roles. The main actor is a middle-aged (50s?) man who's like a cross between Tammy Fae Baker and Bruce Willis. He performs ridiculously choreographed stylized sword fights in which he defeats legions of enemy without ever getting within 3 feet of them. Every time he makes an entrance, an MC on mic announces his name over the blown-out PA system, and the audience is supposed to shout his name and cheer him on. He appears in vignette after vignette, with minimal dialogue and maximum maudlin melodrama and cheap spectacle, and there is a perpetual spotlight on him, no matter where he is on stage. In the finale, he comes out in an emerald green sequined Japanese gown, and sings a song about how there's only the actor's life for him. He is sweaty, wobbling into the house (full of Americans who haven't understood a word he has said throughout the evening, and probably think this is "great exotic Japanese performance"), and full of pride. At the curtain call, he attempts to introduce some of the long-time actors in his company, but he can't remember their names. Ah, the irony, the poignancy, the heartbreak...

Monday, November 05, 2007

The mythologies of John Moran (and his neighbor Saori)


When I first ever saw a work by John Moran, it was at the Kitchen, and he had just gone through terrible heartbreak. After his long-time German (I think?) partner and girlfriend left him, he incorporated the sad event into his lush looping Goldberg Variations, weaving this beautiful wistful story of loss through seamlessly interwoven and looping soundtracks and choreography. That was the first time Saori worked with him, and whatever conflicts or dramas they might have had, together I think they are wonderful artistic collaborators.

Their latest at PS122 was not really about (as the titles of the piece suggested) what if Saori had a party? but it was instead a rather dark meditation on mortality and loss of innocence. The top of the show introduces Saori as a super-cute robotic anime-type character who lives in a bubble (think Astroboy + Teletubbies + Twiggy x a dose of acid). She is "not real" as she admits, and desires nothing more in the world than "to exist" (i.e. be real). Her companion, Mr. Computer (which is just the voice of a talking mac) informs her that today, somehow, her wish can be granted -- today is her first ever birthday. A singing telegram man shows up with a surprise birthday present -- which turns out to be a baby. Saori must then learn to take care of this baby, who fusses and cries, and repeatedly goes through a cycle of "growing up." Eventually in an effort to understand why the baby suffers, and what loss means, Saori is burst out of her bubble and experiences the suffering of life first-hand, all the way to death. It's a poignant Pinocchio story without glorious salvation or redemption. Though it never reaches the depths of grotesqueness and despair that compares to the height of its saccharine sweetness, Saori's Birthday was still a great display of Saori's phenomenal physical control and grace of movement, Katie Brook's precision and sweetness, Joseph Keckler's awesome singing voice and John's deeply emotional sound-score that spirals the audience into intimate moments of vulnerability.

Friday, November 02, 2007

Dan in Real Life is not real


I heart Steve Carell, OK, I'm sorry, but that is just the bottom line for me. So, yes, I WILL drag my boyfriend to see a dumb romantic comedy-type movie just to see Steve on screen for an hour or two. Dan in Real Life, for which I had low expectations, was pretty much as I thought it would be, nothing more, nothing worse. It was definitely one of those movies (like Little Miss Sunshine) that comedy actors tend to make when they want to expand their "range" like The Truman Show and Eternal Sunshine for Jim Carrey (pretty great movies), or The Final Cut and One Hour Photo and Insomnia for Robin Williams (all terrible). But Steve was pretty understated, believable and sympathetic as the widowed father of three pre/pubescent daughters. Much was unbelievable in the premise of the movie (the whole falling in love with the psycho woman (Juliette Binoche) in the bookstore who babbles on endlessly, her falling for him, I mean essentially the whole darned plot) but really, who cares. Diane Weist plays Steve's mom [Irwin: She looks so OLD!!!]. Not really sure who this movie is FOR. I mean, besides Steve Carell fans.