If you don't know already, I have a pretty violent love-hate relationship with theater -- but it reaches another level of intensity when it comes to "Asian-American" theater -- or "Asian-American" anything. I don't know if any of you other "Asian-Americans" feel this way... but when I went to the Second Generation's 10th Anniversary Reading Event
TEN and found myself amidst a throng of Asian-Americans, I was
not filled with irrepressible pride and sense of community -- in fact I felt extremely self-conscious and kind of embarrassed. Like, "Look at that big crowd of Asian people over there, they're there because they're
Asian." I don't know how to make sense of this -- I don't feel that uncomfortable going to see an occasional film at
Imaginasian. But there is something about cultural identity being thrust to the forefront of the agenda that makes me lose my appetite. A lot. Not that I don't like being Asian. I love it. But I don't consider it THE defining characteristic of my personal identity, and don't feel the need to talk about it incessantly and get worked up about it all the time. It's more like, OK, enough about ME, can we just talk about what's important?
So as you can imagine, I was already feeling rather nauseated as I was shuttled into the
Public Theater (feeling as if we were all waving a flag saying "I'm Asian and Proud!") and the terribly delivered cheesy curtain speech didn't help either:
Over 350 actors auditioned for these 10 10-minute plays for 2 evenings
celebrating the 10 years of Second Generation (blablabla) Thank you so much for
supporting us, and continue to support us in telling our stories, because it is
SO important for us to share our stories of being Asian in America with the
world...
Am I a bad Asian for wanting to barf at this speech?
And for those of you who aren't "Asian-American" and wonder what the "Asian-American" plight is all about (particularly for the second generation), it encompasses the following, according to the ten plays that were read last night:
- Being isolated, estranged, ostracized, stereotyped, exoticized within the context of a predominantly white mainstream culture.
- Not speaking the language of your 'motherland.'
- Having evil parents who over-discipline and have outrageous expectations and make their children develop insane paranoia and self-doubt and social retardation.
And how do Asian-Americans react/counteract these things? Some suggestions offered by the playwrights were:
- Get really bitter and angry and cold.
- Figure out how to break rules.
- Satirize yourself.
- Stick to the urban centers; avoid the country.
- Never leave the house and watch anime.
A lot of these things rang true for me, but I also didn't feel the need for these things to be publicly addressed. In all honestly, the most interesting thing about the evening for me, was not the content of the plays, but the form.
The TEN-MINUTE PLAY is an odd little genre, bite-sized theater that are more like sketches. In many ways it draws out the best in artists -- writers don't dawdle about in unnecessary extraneous details and go for the punch with precision and economy; actors tackle the text in broad strokes, fast and bold decisions. It's easy to capture an audiences' attention for 10 minutes (as opposed to 2 hours) and, even if you bore them, it's over in ten. Of course, no theater would fully produce a single ten-minute play for a 4-week run -- so one wonders what truly is the purpose of this truncated form. But everything seems to be evolving to be shorter, faster (and therefore more shallow? Continuing exploration of the topic with Tmonkey)
To my great surprise and unexpected pleasure, the plays last night were all passably good, and probably the best writing I'd seen from many of the playwrights. Like Chiori Miyagawa, for example, whose works in the past I've found rather elusive and esoteric. Her City Lights presented a series of morphing vignette/conversations between two women, usually one white and the other Asian, about life in a small (affluent, educated, white) town in upstate New York. No doubt she was processing her experiences teaching at Bard. Much of it was trite, but funny, if a bit scathing -- something different from her usually opaque style.
Other memorable slices (reconstructed & approximated): In Michael Golamco's Heartbreaker a teenage boy tells his sister that her boyfriend is "so white he's a snowman, with a carrot for a nose." David Henry Hwang's ridiculous The Great Helmsman in which two comrades (women) vie for the amorous affections of their great leader through a battle of communist slogans infused with over-the-top sexual innuendo. And the playful tv mockumentary-style Asian Accents in the Key of Sucky Sucky by Qui Nguyen, who explores the profoundly disturbing phenomenon of the lack of Asian accent in the English spoken by the next generation of Asian-Americans "konnichiwa muthafuckas" -- sure signs of a culture in collapse.
But the most remarkable piece of the evening was Julia Cho's Round and Round, a devastatingly moving piece about a married couple breaking up. I'd seen her Durango and BFE, both of which I found kind of stilted, predictable and tedious, so I was really surprised to find this one so compelling. Sue Jean Kim (who was in BFE) and Rajesh Bose were just terrific -- very watchable, honest performances. The play begins with George (Bose), a linguist, speaking to the audience expressing his concern about the recent inexplicable change that has occurred in his wife. She used to be so upbeat, but now she cries a lot, at the drop of a hat, at long-distance phone commercials, at nature shows when animals of prey are devoured by predators, at nothing. Mary (Kim) who's been sitting there gazing off into space the whole time, asks George why he's talking about her again, when she's sitting right there, hearing every word he says. Thus the story unfolds -- Mary wants to leave George because she seems to have lost her faith in their ability to understand one another -- she wants to go out dancing, and it seems obvious to her that there are thousands of reasons to weep in the world, and she is disturbed that George seems to be emotionless. He didn't even grieve when his grandmother died. George has three chances to say something to change her mind (a theatrical mechanism [i.e. light change] allows one possible storyline to play out, then time warps back to a prior moment to play out another storyline, a sort of choose-your-own-adventure). The funny thing is, in a way, all three times, George is saying the same thing, to varying degrees of being understood. He is saddened by the fact that as a linguist he learned so many languages, but never the one that his grandmother spoke. That of the 6500 languages in the world today, half of them will be extinct in ten years, and he cannot bear the idea that their private language born of two people should die. In the end, though, she leaves, and he is left to ponder from the beginning, expressing his concern about the recent inexplicable change that has occurred in his wife. She used to be so upbeat, but now she cries a lot, at the drop of a hat, at long-distance phone commercials, at nature shows when animals of prey are devoured by predators, at nothing...
This was so successful and poignant, because the crux of the play was the tension around a human relationship, rather than a concept or agenda about race, white-bashing, or finding empowerment after being victimized.
---> Asides from Kim & Bose, the acting overall throughout the evening was pretty uneven, some stellar moments by Allison Mui and the glib Yung-I Chang -- who seem to be, according to the playbill, the two least experienced actors of the lot. hmmm
I feel I've done my Asian-American duty for the year by attending this event, so now I can go back to staying at home with my Asian-American boyfriend to make rice for dinner and play video games and watch anime all night, without guilt. Whew!